We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 01 April 11
DRY BULK MARKET WEAKENS ON SLOWER DEMAND, HOPES FOR MID-TERM REBOUND ON JAPANS RECONSTRUCTION - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market, as reflected in the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) retreated for a third day yesterday, after staying flat on Monday, to end at 1,530 p ...
Wednesday, 30 March 11
CHALLENGER SIGNS OPTION AGREEMENTS TO PURCHASE FOUR COAL PROJECTS IN INDONESIA
Challenger Signs Three Exclusive Option Agreements to Purchase Four Coal Projects in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
Challenger Deep Resources Corp.ha ...
Wednesday, 30 March 11
KPCL TO IMPORT ONE MILLION TONS OF 6300 GAD COAL
COALspot.com - Karnataka Power Corporation a state utility of Karnataka, India called for open tender for supply of one million tons of 6300 Kcal/kg ...
Wednesday, 30 March 11
WIKA GRABS PROJECT FROM ADARO INDONESIA - INSIDER STORIES
One of Indonesia's largest thermal coal PT Adaro Indonesia has finally mandated PT Wijaya Karya Tbk (WIKA) as a contractor to install and manage ov ...
Tuesday, 29 March 11
JAPAN FACTOR RIPPLING THROUGH THE SHIPPING MARKETS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With the world watching the latest developments regarding the nuclear crisis in Japan and the devastating effects of the recent tragedy that struck ...
|
|
|
Showing 5321 to 5325 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
