We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 17 April 11
ADARO TO PROPOSE US$75 MILLION DIVIDEND
COALspot.com - One of Indonesia's largest coal miner PT Adaro Energy Tbk (ADRO) is keen to propose a final dividend of US$75 million or Rp 20.17 (U ...
Saturday, 16 April 11
TNPL RECEIVES 1.6MT OF COAL OFFERS - SOURCES
COALspot.com - Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd. has closed its 160,000 MT coal inquiry today.
More than a half a dozen of Indian coal t ...
Friday, 15 April 11
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS ON FALLING, ON LOW DEMAND AND HIGH SUPPLY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has kept its falling patern this week, with the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) retreating again yesterda ...
Thursday, 14 April 11
SUPRAS IN N.CHINA GET CLOSE TO $12000 FOR TRIPS VIA INDONESIA TO INDIA - FEARNBULK
Handy
The Atlantic market remains flat - very little new/fresh business and slow activity. Considerable prompt tonnage remains unfixed. The USG pa ...
Wednesday, 13 April 11
CAPESIZE VESSELS ARE DELIVERED AT A PACE OF ONE NEW VESSEL EVERY SECOND DAY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
In a clear sign that it will take a significant rise in global seaborne dry bulk trade in order to be able to absorb the flurry of new building tonn ...
|
|
|
Showing 5306 to 5310 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
|
| |
| |
|