We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 29 March 11
DUTY EXEMPTION UNLIKELY TO IMPACT COKING COAL PRICES - PTI NEWS
Press Trust of India News reported that, the exemption to certain types of coking coal from customs duty is not likely to impact steel prices at pre ...
Monday, 28 March 11
HARUM ENERGY FY10 EARNING UP 7.23% - INSIDER STORIES
Thermal coal producer PT Harum Energy Tbk (HRUM), controlled by Indonesian businessman Kiki Barki through his son Lawrence Barki, posted a slight in ...
Monday, 28 March 11
IBT RAISES CAPACITY OF PULAU LAUT TERMINAL - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, coal infrastructure and logistics firm PT Indonesia Bulk Terminal (IBT), a subsidiary of PT Adaro Energy Tbk, plans ...
Saturday, 26 March 11
THE FREIGHT MARKET REMAINED A BIT VOLATILE THIS WEEK - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com - "The freight market remained a bit volatile this week", says Capt. Reddy, director of Vistaar Shipping Singapore.
Howeve ...
Saturday, 26 March 11
FLSMIDTH WINS MULTIMILLION DOLLAR MATERIAL HANDLING PROJECT IN INDONESIA
FLSmidth has signed a contract in Jakarta worth in excess of USD 135m (DKK 700m) with PT Adaro Indonesia, a subsidiary of PT Adaro Energy Tbk., to s ...
|
|
|
Showing 5326 to 5330 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PTC India Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- The University of Queensland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
