We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 10 April 11
SOFT FREIGHT MARKET TREND LIKELY TO BE CONTINUED - VISTAAR SHIPPING
COALspot.com - The freight market continued to soften further with the BDI breaking the 1,500 points and closing at 1376 points down by almost 10 pc ...
Thursday, 07 April 11
HANDY RATES SLIDING NOW - FEARNBULK
Handy
Slowly softening rates as more tonnage is accumulating in the Atlantic basin.The trans-Atlantic round is around $15k pd with trips to ...
Thursday, 07 April 11
DRY BULK MARKET PLUNGING EVEN FURTHER ON LOW CARGO DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has continued its falling pattern this week, with every day proving to be painful for ship owners, especially those of the large ...
Thursday, 07 April 11
INDIKA BUYS MITRABAHTERA AT US$ 0.183
PT Indika Energy Tbk (INDY), integrated energy company, today has exercised an option agreement to acquire 51% shareholding in newly listed coal tug ...
Wednesday, 06 April 11
FORBES & MANHATTAN COAL ANNOUNCES SIGNIFICANT OFF TAKE AGREEMENT
Steady Cash Flow Will Fund Production Ramp Up
Forbes & Manhattan Coal Corp., ("Forbes Coal" or the "Company") is a produc ...
|
|
|
Showing 5311 to 5315 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
