We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 28 July 21
IN THE PHILIPPINES, COAL’S DEMISE MAKES WAY FOR A RENEWABLE ENERGY BOOM - IEEFA
Imported gas lock-in could undermine the economic benefits of a clean energy transition
The Philippines’ energy sector is on t ...
Wednesday, 28 July 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Assessing the ship repair sector during this first half of the year, we continue to come across surprises and new restrictions which are trembling ...
Saturday, 24 July 21
UNDERSTANDING INDIA'S LATEST PEAK POWER DEMAND RECORD - IEEFA
Ramping up solar will be crucial as peak power demand hits during the day
At around noon on 7 July 2021, India’s instantaneous ...
Wednesday, 21 July 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Dry Buk Sales and Purchase activity has heated up during 2021, reaching record high levels during the first half of the year. The increased interes ...
Monday, 19 July 21
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT UP 6.4 PCT IN H1 - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output climbed 6.4 percent year on year to 1.95 billion tonnes in the first six months of the year, official data showed.
...
|
|
|
Showing 516 to 520 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- White Energy Company Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Australian Coal Association
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
