We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 13 August 21
INDONESIA’S COAL EXPORTS TO JAPAN DECLINED BY -26.3% YOY TO 11.9 MLN TONNES IN THE FIRST 7 MONTHS OF 2021; STILL THE SECOND LARGEST SOURCE FOR JAPAN’S COAL IMPORTS IS INDONESIA - BANCHERO COSTA
2020 proved to be a truly terrible year for global seaborne coal trade. Total global loadings in the 12 months of 2020 were down -12.7% year-on-yea ...
Thursday, 12 August 21
ONLY 3 VLCCS SOLD FOR DEMOLITION IN 2021 AS SECONDHAND PRICES TEMPT - BIMCO
During the first seven months of 2021, only three actively trading Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) have been sold for demolition. The current mar ...
Wednesday, 11 August 21
U.S: EIA EXPECTS COAL EXPORTS TO TOTAL 90 MMST IN 2021, 30% INCREASE FROM 2020
Coal production in EIA's forecast totals 607 million short tons (MMst) in 2021, an increase of 13% over 2020.
EIA is also ...
Wednesday, 11 August 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Energy is at the core of the global climate dialogue as the climate challenge is essentially an energy challenge. Policy experts around the world a ...
Tuesday, 10 August 21
34 INDONESIAN COAL COMPANIES TEMPORARILY BANNED FOR COAL EXPORTS
The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) has imposed sanctions in the form of a coal export ban for 34 coal companies as reported by CNB ...
|
|
|
Showing 506 to 510 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- White Energy Company Limited
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Australian Coal Association
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PTC India Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Planning Commission, India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
