We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 17 July 21
COAL PRICES TRADE AT DECADE HIGH OF $140 PER TONNE, HERE ARE SOME FACTORS AT PLAY: CNBC-TV18
Coal prices are trading at $140 per tonne. In the last one week, coal has seen more than 8 percent gains; the last one month has seen 24 percent ju ...
Thursday, 15 July 21
U.S. FOSSIL FUEL CONSUMPTION FELL BY 9% IN 2020, THE LOWEST LEVEL IN NEARLY 30 YEARS - EIA
U.S. fossil fuel consumption fell by 9% in 2020, the lowest level in nearly 30 years
In 2020, total consumption of fossil fuels in t ...
Thursday, 15 July 21
IN 2020, U.S. COAL PRODUCTION FELL TO ITS LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1965 - EIA
U.S. coal production totaled 535 million short tons (MMst) in 2020, a 24% decrease from the 706 MMst mined in 2019 and the lowest level of coal pro ...
Wednesday, 14 July 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
In its latest Global Economic Prospects report, the world bank recorded the strongest post-recession global growth in 80 years, but emerging and de ...
Tuesday, 13 July 21
JAPAN STILL SEEKING TO EXPLOIT COAL POWER LOOPHOLES - IEEFA
JBIC wants to continue burdening developing nations with its expensive coal-fired power technology
Japan is continuing to push its expensive c ...
|
|
|
Showing 521 to 525 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
