We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 11 July 21
COAL SHOWS ITS STAYING POWER AS ECONOMIES BOUNCE BACK - THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Coal use is surging in some of the world’s largest economies as electricity demand rebounds from the pandemic, illustrating the challenges to ...
Sunday, 11 July 21
ROBUST CHINA COAL DEMAND AMID AUSTRALIA IMPORT BAN FUELS PRICE RALLY - REUTERS
Seaborne coal has become a quiet winner among energy commodities, lacking the attention of higher-profile crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) ...
Saturday, 10 July 21
OVERESTIMATED LCOES OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS CREATE A FINANCIAL BUBBLE - IEEFA
Massive stranded asset risk detrimentally affects the financial and power distribution
India’s future coal-fired power project pipeline ...
Friday, 09 July 21
EIA FORECASTS COAL’S GENERATION SHARE IN U.S TO RISE FROM 20% IN 2020 TO 24% THIS YEAR BUT TO FALL TO 22% NEXT YEAR
The July Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) of EIA remains subject to heightened levels of uncertainty related to the ongoing economic recovery from ...
Friday, 09 July 21
KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. INVITES BIDS FOR 1.86 MILLION TONS OF COAL OF 5600 & 4000 NCV COAL FOR THREE YEARS
COALspot.com: South Korea’s KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. (KOEN) has issued an international tender for 280,000 – 300,000 MT of Min. ...
|
|
|
Showing 526 to 530 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
