We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 August 21
AIIB MAY OFFICIALLY END COAL FINANCING IN 2022 - CHINA DAILY
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank may officially rule out coal projects if it updates its energy strategy next year, after shunning funding ...
Monday, 09 August 21
CHINA COAL INVENTORY THINS AMID PEAK POWER DEMAND- STATE MEDIA : REUTERS
China’s coal inventories have dropped to near historic lows since August due to peak summer electricity demand and transportation bottlenecks ...
Wednesday, 04 August 21
THE INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE SURGED TO A FRESH RECORD HIGH OF USD 130.99 A TON IN AUGUST 2021
COALspot.com: The Indonesian Coal Price Reference ( HBA) surged to a fresh record high of USD 130.99 a ton in August 2021.
The ...
Wednesday, 04 August 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Unlike the Dry Bulk and Container sectors where freight rates have surged into 2021, the tankers market continues to experience lackluster earnings ...
Sunday, 01 August 21
SEABORNE HARD COAL TRADE IN 2020 DECREASED BY 149 MILLION MT, OR 12.1%, TO 1,083 MILLION MT - GERMAN COAL IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION
- Reduced coal-fired power plant fleet secures Germany’s power supply in severe winter of 2020/2021; little wind availability and hence stron ...
|
|
|
Showing 511 to 515 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- White Energy Company Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Coal Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
|
| |
| |
|
