We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 23 August 21
CHINESE COAL PRODUCTION RISES 4.9 PCT IN 1ST 7 MONTHS OF 2021 - NBS
Official figures demonstrated that the Chinese raw coal production surged 4.9 percent annually to 2.26 billion tonnes in the January-July period of ...
Friday, 20 August 21
ARE WE LOOKING AT THE NEXT DRY BULK SUPER CYCLE? IS IT EVEN A CYCLE? - BIMCO
Throughout the first half of the year, talk of a new dry bulk super cycle has been on many lips as commodity prices have soared to multi-year highs ...
Friday, 20 August 21
BIMCO'S SHIPPING NUMBER OF THE WEEK: CHINESE IRON ORE IMPORTS FALL TO 14-MONTH LOW IN JULY - PETER SAND
Chinese iron ore imports fell to 88.5 million tonnes in July, the lowest level since May 2020. The fall in July means that accumulated imports are ...
Friday, 20 August 21
SOARING DEMAND FOR THE WORLD’S LEAST-LIKED COMMODITY SEES THERMAL COAL PRICES JUMP 106% THIS YEAR - CNBC
Soaring electricity demand, infrastructure woes and a surge in global gas prices have triggered an extraordinary rally for the world’s least ...
Friday, 20 August 21
CHINA’S IRON ORE IMPORTS CONTRACTED YEAR-ON-YEAR BY 2% IN 2018 AND GREW YEAR-ON-YEAR BY ONLY 1% IN 2019 - COMMODORE RESEARCH
Examining the last ten years of China’s crude steel output and iron ore imports shows that China’s iron ore imports have stayed r ...
|
|
|
Showing 501 to 505 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- The University of Queensland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
|
| |
| |
|
