We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 27 August 21
THE ECONOMICS OF INDONESIA’S DIESEL POWER PLANT TO GAS CONVERSION PLAN ARE PROBLEMATIC - IEEFA
Deploying new small-scale LNG is an uphill battle for PGN
Indonesian gas is currently in a precarious position, where the government needs to ...
Thursday, 26 August 21
INDIA IMPORTED 17.06 MLN TONNES OF LPG IN 2020; UP 11.5% Y-O-Y
Global LPG trade remained fairly positive in 2020, despite the global economic impact from COVID-19, and surged strongly in the first half of 2021. ...
Thursday, 26 August 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
24th of August 2021, the Baltic Dry Index reached 4,201, a YTD high and the highest since May 2010.
Cape 5TC daily average @ 51,472
...
Tuesday, 24 August 21
COAL PRICE RALLY TO PRESSURE CHINESE POWER GENCOS’ MARGINS FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings expects the pressure on Chinese power generation companies’ (gencos) profit from the recent coal price surge to weaken their cr ...
Tuesday, 24 August 21
TIGHT POWER SUPPLY IN CHINA AMID STRONG DEMAND, HIGH COAL PRICES - FITCH RATINGS
China experienced tight power supply in 1H21 on stronger than expected power demand as economic activity continued to recover, Fitch Ratings says i ...
|
|
|
Showing 496 to 500 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The University of Queensland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
|
| |
| |
|
