We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 08 September 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Last August was extremely hot in the dry bulk market with rates rising at levels that we have years to witness. The dry bulk index exceeded the 4,0 ...
Wednesday, 01 September 21
KOMIPO TO BUY 1.56 MILLION TONS OF 5600 NAR COAL OF AUSTRALIA OR SOUTH AFRICAN ORIGIN FOR 2022 - 2024
COALspot.com: Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd (KOMIPO) has issued an international tender for total 1,560,000 MT of Bituminous Coal to be used a ...
Wednesday, 01 September 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As the summer season is coming to an end, the dry bulk market continues to rally. The confidence that the outstanding freight market performance ha ...
Monday, 30 August 21
68% OF U.S. COAL FLEET RETIREMENTS SINCE 2011 WERE PLANTS FUELED BY BITUMINOUS COAL - EIA
In 2011, the United States had 317.6 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired electric generation capacity. About 88.7 GW of that capacity was retired in the d ...
Friday, 27 August 21
ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT COAL'S MASSIVE RALLY AND NEAR-TERM OUTLOOK - CNBCTV18
Australia’s thermal coal at Newcastle Port, the benchmark for the vast Asian market, has surged over 100 percent this year to trade above $16 ...
|
|
|
Showing 491 to 495 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Coal Association
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
