We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 02 November 14
CAPE INDEX WAS UP 46.65% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI and Cape index continued the strong upward trend this week. The BDI was up 19.80 pct and Cape index was up by 46.65 per ...
Friday, 31 October 14
BUKIT ASAM'S NET PROFIT ROSE 27.42% FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY - SEPTEMBER 2014
COALspot.com: Publicly listed coal miner Bukit Asam reported solid profits in the first nine months of 2014 year.
Coal miner Bukit Asam manage ...
Friday, 31 October 14
U.S PRODUCED AROUND 19.3 MMST OF COAL IN A WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 30 October 14
COAL & GRAINS SUPPORT PANAMAX AND IRON ORE SUPPORTS CAPES
Handy
The Atlantic market has been flat this week. Rates are up about US$ 200 from last week on the TA´s, but the volumes are about the sam ...
Wednesday, 29 October 14
GOOD REASON WHY Q4 CAPESIZE OUTLOOK WAS SO BULLISH AT START OF THE YEAR - COMMODORE RESEARCH
COALspot.com: There was good reason why so many analysts' capesize outlook for Q4 was so very strong at the start of this year. Brazilian ...
|
|
|
Showing 3401 to 3405 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Coal Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Economic Council, Georgia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
