We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 02 November 14
CAPE INDEX WAS UP 46.65% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI and Cape index continued the strong upward trend this week. The BDI was up 19.80 pct and Cape index was up by 46.65 per ...
Friday, 31 October 14
BUKIT ASAM'S NET PROFIT ROSE 27.42% FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY - SEPTEMBER 2014
COALspot.com: Publicly listed coal miner Bukit Asam reported solid profits in the first nine months of 2014 year.
Coal miner Bukit Asam manage ...
Friday, 31 October 14
U.S PRODUCED AROUND 19.3 MMST OF COAL IN A WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 30 October 14
COAL & GRAINS SUPPORT PANAMAX AND IRON ORE SUPPORTS CAPES
Handy
The Atlantic market has been flat this week. Rates are up about US$ 200 from last week on the TA´s, but the volumes are about the sam ...
Wednesday, 29 October 14
GOOD REASON WHY Q4 CAPESIZE OUTLOOK WAS SO BULLISH AT START OF THE YEAR - COMMODORE RESEARCH
COALspot.com: There was good reason why so many analysts' capesize outlook for Q4 was so very strong at the start of this year. Brazilian ...
|
|
|
Showing 3401 to 3405 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- White Energy Company Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Planning Commission, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
