We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 04 November 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAPS FOR 2015 DELIVERIES SHOW A WEAK TREND
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q4' 2014 lost month on month and gained day on day and week on week, the trend was same as las ...
Tuesday, 04 November 14
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS GAINED WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 1.09 (-1.99%) month over month and increased US$ 0.31 (+0.58% ...
Monday, 03 November 14
ADARO PRODUCED 41.90MT OF COAL FOR FIRST 9 MONTHS OF 2014
COALspot.com: Adaro’s coal production in the third quarter reached 14.03 Mt, a 2% increase compared to the same period of last year. Accordin ...
Monday, 03 November 14
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q4' 2014 DELIVERY LOST 2.80% MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery has decreased US$ 1.86 (-2.80%) month over month and increased US$ 0.37 ( ...
Monday, 03 November 14
INDONESIAN'S COAL EXPORTS JUMP IN SEPTEMBER
COALspot.com: Indonesia, one of the world's largest coal producers and the global leading multi grade coal exporter shipped around $1.50 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3396 to 3400 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Coal Association
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The University of Queensland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
