We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 28 October 14
SGX'S FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR DELIVERY Q1' 2015 CLOSED AT $ 68.07 ON 24 OCT
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 0.65 (-0.96%) month over month and increased US$ 1.79 (+2. ...
Tuesday, 28 October 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 15 DELIVERY CLOSED 3.68% LOWER MONTH ON MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q4' 2014 lost month on month and gained day on day and week on week.
The swap has lost US ...
Monday, 27 October 14
GOVT PROMISES TO EASE LICENSING PROCEDURES IN MINING SECTOR - THE JAKARTA POST
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry’s directorate general for mineral and coal plans to simplify the complicated licensing procedures i ...
Monday, 27 October 14
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 15 DELIVERY CLOSED $ 0.10 LESSER THAN Q4' 14 CLOSING OF $ 53.27 PMT
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 1.43 (-2.61%) month over month and increased US$ 0.05 (+0.09% ...
Monday, 27 October 14
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS PERFORMED POSITIVE THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 1.68 (-2.55%) month over month and increased US$ 0.87 (+1.3 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3406 to 3410 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The University of Queensland
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Minerals Council of Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
