We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 09 November 14
CAPE INDEX UP 3.06%; PANAMAX INDEX FELL 4.05%
COALspot.com: The BDI was almost at same levels compared to last week closing or just increased 0.77 pct from last week. The BDI was closed at 1437 ...
Friday, 07 November 14
U.S. PRODUCED 85.60 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL IN OCTOBER, UP 2.88% M-O-M
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.0 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 06 November 14
THE ATLANTIC HAS REMAINED STRONG WITH A HEALTHY SUPPLY OF NEW CARGOES
Handy
This week has continued its slow trend in both hemispheres and even though rates are a bit up w-o-w it is not a clear sign for any improvem ...
Wednesday, 05 November 14
CAPESIZE SEGMENT ENJOYED FIRMING RATES ACROSS BOTH BASINS
Following a fantastic week in terms of rate performance for Capes, the Dry Bulk market managed to note another positive weekly closing, which stron ...
Wednesday, 05 November 14
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - PANOS TSILINGIRIS
COALspot.com: The steep appreciation in dry bulker values between late 2012 and March 2014 resulted in unrealistically expensive ship values compar ...
|
|
|
Showing 3391 to 3395 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Planning Commission, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Australian Coal Association
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
