We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 October 14
CAPE'S STRONG PERFORMANCE PUSHES BDI INDEX UPWARDS
COALspot.com: The BDI was up by 26.27 pct and closed at 1192 points week and week. The Cape size performance has pushed up BDI and Cape size index ...
Friday, 24 October 14
WEEKLY U.S COAL PRODUCTION DOWN 2.7% FOR THE WEEK ENDING OCTOBER 18
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of largest coal producers, produced approximately 18.7 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 23 October 14
THE BEARS, HOWEVER, STILL CRY; FOR HOW LONG WILL IT LAST? - FEARNLEYS
Handy
"We experience a typical oversupply of ships in the Atlantic which causing rates to slide. In the USG it is just enough cargoes to kee ...
Wednesday, 22 October 14
MARKET INSIGHT - THEODORE NTALAKOS, INTERMODAL
ECO designs - revisited
The ECO vessels are already here but the oil and bunker prices are plummeting to their cheapest level since 2010. Is this ...
Wednesday, 22 October 14
CAPESIZE MARKET REMAINED UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market closed on the red for yet another week although following Friday sentiment has started to improve on the back of ...
|
|
|
Showing 3411 to 3415 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
