We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 11 November 14
PORT OF NEWCASTLE'S OCTOBER COAL SHIPMENTS SLIPPED 7.40% M-O-M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1,115.7 mil ...
Monday, 10 November 14
Q4' 15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED LOWER THAN Q1' 15 CLOSING PRICE OF US$ 49.58 ON LAST FRIDAY
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month, week on week and day on day.
The Q1 swap has lost just US$ ...
Monday, 10 November 14
SGX'S API 4 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 2015 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 65.44 ON 7 NOV, LOST 4.08% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased US$ 2.78 (-4.08%) month over month and US$ 1.41 (-2.11%) w ...
Monday, 10 November 14
MOZAMBIQUE SIGNED CONTRACT WITH ETA STAR OF UAE FOR OPEN CAST COAL MINE IN TETE - AIM
- ETA Star to build slurry pipeline over the 600 kilometers to Beira in Mozambique to transport coal.
- The viability studies show the presence o ...
Monday, 10 November 14
YEAR 2015 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP SHOWS A WEAK TREND THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased US$ 3.74 (-5.63%) month over month and US$ 2.19 (+3.37%) we ...
|
|
|
Showing 3386 to 3390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
