We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 11 November 14
PORT OF NEWCASTLE'S OCTOBER COAL SHIPMENTS SLIPPED 7.40% M-O-M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1,115.7 mil ...
Monday, 10 November 14
Q4' 15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED LOWER THAN Q1' 15 CLOSING PRICE OF US$ 49.58 ON LAST FRIDAY
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month, week on week and day on day.
The Q1 swap has lost just US$ ...
Monday, 10 November 14
SGX'S API 4 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 2015 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 65.44 ON 7 NOV, LOST 4.08% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased US$ 2.78 (-4.08%) month over month and US$ 1.41 (-2.11%) w ...
Monday, 10 November 14
MOZAMBIQUE SIGNED CONTRACT WITH ETA STAR OF UAE FOR OPEN CAST COAL MINE IN TETE - AIM
- ETA Star to build slurry pipeline over the 600 kilometers to Beira in Mozambique to transport coal.
- The viability studies show the presence o ...
Monday, 10 November 14
YEAR 2015 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP SHOWS A WEAK TREND THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased US$ 3.74 (-5.63%) month over month and US$ 2.19 (+3.37%) we ...
|
|
|
Showing 3386 to 3390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
