We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 13 November 14
MODERN DRY BULK SHIPS' PRICES START FIRMING UP - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
While the main story of the past few weeks has been the rebound of the dry bulk market, which has been a result of increased Chinese iron ore impor ...
Wednesday, 12 November 14
PANAMAX: WITNESSED A FAIRLY STABLE MARKET IN THE ATLANTIC
COALspot.com: Despite the fact that the Dry Bulk market noted another weekly increase, clouds of uncertainty returned mid-week onwards, as the mini ...
Wednesday, 12 November 14
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - CHRISTOPHER T. WHITTY
COALspot.com: The fight continues between the low-cost iron ore producers and the big three: Vale, Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton. We are moving into a ...
Tuesday, 11 November 14
FACING CHALLENGES AND MEETING OPPORTUNITIES - INTERNATIONAL EPC CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION
Press Release: SKYCONNECTION and TRANSEVENT, which is fully supported by the Institution of Engineers Indonesia and Ministry of Industry of the Rep ...
Tuesday, 11 November 14
NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 52.65 FOR Q1' 15 DELIVERY
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery decreased US$ 2.83 (-5.10%) month over month and US$ 1.35 (-2.50%) week ove ...
|
|
|
Showing 3381 to 3385 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
|
| |
| |
|
