We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 12 May 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP; DECLINED M-O-M AND W-O-W
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 lost week over week and month on month, this past week.
The Q3 swap was declined US$ 0 ...
Tuesday, 12 May 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS: LOST W-O-W; GAIN M-O-M
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 increased month over month and decreased week over week.
The Q3 swap h ...
Monday, 11 May 15
DRY BULK CARRIER ORDERS CRASH TO A TWENTY YEAR LOW - CLARKSONS
In the last four months dry bulk orders have fallen to 0.4m dwt per month, the lowest level since the 1990s. This is a massive 98% reduction from t ...
Monday, 11 May 15
HBA PRICE DIPS FURTHER; LOWEST RECORDED SINCE JANUARY 2009
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark prices to US$ 61.08 per MT in May ...
Monday, 11 May 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP; INCREASED M-O-M; DECLINED W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery gained US$ 0.62 per MT (1.41%) month over month and lost US$ 0.88 week on w ...
|
|
|
Showing 3026 to 3030 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Australian Coal Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The University of Queensland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
