We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 20 May 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS GAINED M-O-M, W-O-W
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 increased month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap has increas ...
Wednesday, 20 May 15
BUKIT ASAM'S AVERAGE EXPORT PRICE WAS UNDER PRESSURE DURING Q1
COALspot.com: Indonesia’s state owned coal producer saw their profits fall in the first quarter of the year compared to the same period last ...
Wednesday, 20 May 15
IRON ORE PRICES TO REMAIN WEAK ON LOW DEMAND, HIGH OUTPUT - FITCH
Iron ore prices will stay low for several years due to increasing supply, weak demand growth in China and the slower-than-expected closure of high- ...
Tuesday, 19 May 15
KOMIPO IS SEEKING TOTAL 2.34 MMT OF HCV AND LCV COAL FOR 2015 - 2017
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender to buy total 2.34 million Metric Tons (MT) of HCV ...
Monday, 18 May 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS SCORE MONTHLY GAINS
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery gained US$ 0.87 per MT (1.99%) month over month and lost US$ 0.03 week on w ...
|
|
|
Showing 3016 to 3020 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- White Energy Company Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Australian Coal Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
|
| |
| |
|
