We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 06 May 15
COMBINATION OF HOLIDAYS AND A SHAKY MARKET PUT ADDITIONAL PRESSURE ON RATES
COALspot.com: The combination of holidays and a shaky market is always a recipe for additional pressure on rates and last week was no exception. Wi ...
Wednesday, 06 May 15
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE ILIOPOULOS
The first four months of 2015 are now behind us and they make up for a decent amount of time to look back and assess how the year is evolving so fa ...
Tuesday, 05 May 15
MIFA BERSAUDARA UNIT OF ABM INVESTAMA STARTS OPERATING $200M COAL MINE IN ACEH
Reswara Minergi Hartama, a coal mining unit of coal miner ABM Investama known as known as Reswara, inaugurated a $200 million integrated coal minin ...
Tuesday, 05 May 15
FREIGHT DERIVATIVE VOLUMES REACHED TOTALED 14,154 CONTRACTS IN APRIL - SGX
COALspot.com: “Our unique suite of freight and bulk commodity products provides market participants with a wide range of trading strategies a ...
Tuesday, 05 May 15
OVERSUPPLY PUTTING INDONESIAN COAL PRICES UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 lost week over week and month on month, this past week.
The Q3 swap was declined US$ 1 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3036 to 3040 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The University of Queensland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
