We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 11 May 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: DECLINED MOM AND WOW
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.46 (-0.90%) per MT month over month and US$ 0.28 (0. ...
Monday, 11 May 15
KOREA MIDLAND POWER INVITES BIDS FOR 140K MT OF 4600 NAR COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a new tender to buy total 140,000 Metric Tons (MT) of Sub-bitumi ...
Sunday, 10 May 15
FREIGHT RATES TO REMAIN SOFT NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was flat to soft week over week except for the Cape Index which was up 7.32%. Cape index was closed at 616 p ...
Friday, 08 May 15
BUSIEST CAPESIZE DEMOLITION MARKET EVER - BIMCO
The activity on the demolition market is off to a good start in 2015 when looking at dry bulk tonnage.
The dry bulk market has long suffered f ...
Friday, 08 May 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN U.S. UP 3.2% THIS PAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.4 million short ...
|
|
|
Showing 3031 to 3035 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
