We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 03 August 15
NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS DECLINE FURTHER THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 1.92 per MT (-4.22%) month over month to US$ 43.58 per mt. The swap ...
Monday, 03 August 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS SLIDE THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 1.64 (3.14%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap ...
Sunday, 02 August 15
CAPESIZE RATES PUSH BDI UPWARD
COALspot.com: The freight market was buoyant this week as BDI rose 4.14 pct to 1131 points. The cape index was also increased 16.50 pct 2209 points ...
Saturday, 01 August 15
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS ITS MOMENTUM, AS OUTLOOK IMPROVES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Although conditions remain more than challenging, especially from an economic point of view (aka China’s stock worries), the dry bulk market ...
Friday, 31 July 15
CAPE'S PAPER MARKET REMAINS FIRM - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The positive sentiment that the Dry Bulk market has been enjoying as of the previous month, was carried through last week as well, bu ...
|
|
|
Showing 2891 to 2895 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
|
| |
| |
|
