We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 31 July 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. UP 3.6% FOR THE WEEK ENDING JULY 25
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.8 million shor ...
Friday, 31 July 15
CHINA'S NEW OIL IMPORT RULES HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON STATUS QUO - FITCH
Fitch Ratings says that China's looser criteria for crude oil import rights are a positive but modest step towards encouraging private-sector p ...
Thursday, 30 July 15
EFFECTS OF THE CHINESE STOCK MARKET CRISIS - INTERMODAL
All evidence is currently signaling that the Chinese stock market will be the newest hurdle for the global economy. With the world's second lar ...
Wednesday, 29 July 15
Q1'16 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED HIGHER THAN Q3'15
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 declined month on month and gains week over week, this past week.
The Q3 swap was decl ...
Wednesday, 29 July 15
Q4' 15 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS DECLINE 4.41% TO $56.52 PMT
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap was down US$ ...
|
|
|
Showing 2896 to 2900 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PTC India Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The University of Queensland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
