We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 05 August 15
COAL CONSUMPTION POSTED THE STRONGEST GROWTH AMONG THE FOSSIL ENERGY SOURCES IN 2014 - VDKI
Coal 2014: again the world's fastest-growing primary energy source and an indispensable asset for the success of the energy turnaround.
Ac ...
Wednesday, 05 August 15
FOB INDONESIA THERMAL COAL SWAPS FALL
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The 4Q swap was declined $ ...
Wednesday, 05 August 15
DRY BULKER PRICES START TO FIRM UP AS MARKET SENTIMENT IMPROVES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Market pessimism in the dry bulk industry, a trend which had established itself over the course of the year, has started to fade away over the past ...
Tuesday, 04 August 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS CONTINUE TO FALL DUE TO SLIDING DEMAND
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Tuesday, 04 August 15
SHIPPING CYCLES - A CHESS GAME YOU DON'T WANT TO LOSE - CLARKSONS
Ingmar Bergman’s classic movie The Seventh Seal is about a knight who, during the Black Death, challenges Death to a chess match, in the hope ...
|
|
|
Showing 2886 to 2890 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Planning Commission, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
