We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 07 August 15
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED 528.1 MMST; DOWN 8.7% Y/Y - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.7 million shor ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
THE RATES FOR CAPES SHOOT UP LAST WEEK; GIVING THIS RECENT RALLY SOME MUCH NEEDED LEGS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market noted another positive closing last week, entirely supported by Capesize performance, which managed to balance th ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
HARD COAL AND COKE IMPORTS TO GERMANY REACH NEW ALL-TIME HIGH OF 56.2M TONES IN 2014
Demand for German and imported hard coal In 2014, in 2014 fell by almost 8%, or 4.8m TCE, to 56.2m TCE.
According to German Coal Importer ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
SEABORNE WORLD TRADE IN STEAM COAL GROWS BY 3% YOY - GERMAN COAL IMPORTER ASSOCIATION
Global trade with hard coal, at 1,272m tones in 2014, increased by 35m tonnes or 3% in comparison with the previous year.
According to associa ...
Wednesday, 05 August 15
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - KATERINA RESTIS
On July 14th, 2015 a historical consensus was reached in Vienna between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, plus Germ ...
|
|
|
Showing 2881 to 2885 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
