We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 13 August 15
THE RATES FOR CAPES KEPT RALLYING LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Strong Capesize performance kept supporting the Dry Bulk market last week, which noted another positive weekly closing, while rates f ...
Thursday, 13 August 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS CONTINUE FALLING
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Wednesday, 12 August 15
DRY BULK MARKET: WITHOUT A DOUBT REACHED HEALTHIER LEVEL
A few weeks before the end of the summer season, the BDI is hovering around 1,200 points, providing some much needed optimism to all Dry Bulk marke ...
Wednesday, 12 August 15
REGULATION CURBS POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN MINING SECTOR IN INDONESIA - FLORENCE G. SANTOSO
The Indonesian Government appears to be getting serious about stripping Regents of the authority to issue mining licenses. The Government took the ...
Wednesday, 12 August 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FLAT WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 0.98 per MT (-2.20%) month over month to US$ 43.65 per mt. The swap ...
|
|
|
Showing 2871 to 2875 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
