We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 22 October 21
CHINA WANTS TO COOL COAL PRICES. SIMILAR MOVES FOR METALS, CRUDE FAILED - REUTERS
China’s latest attempt to lower runaway commodity prices, this time for thermal coal, is likely to follow a familiar pattern of initial succe ...
Friday, 22 October 21
HARD COAL REMAINS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR FOR SECURITY OF SUPPLY - COAL IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION, GERMANY
- Hard coal remains an important factor for security of supply
- Increase of around 35% in hard-coal-fired power generation in the first three ...
Wednesday, 20 October 21
CHINA'S COAL SHORTAGE TO EASE IN COMING MONTHS, INDUSTRY BODY SAYS - REUTERS
China’s coal shortage will likely ease in coming months, with domestic production and imports already showing signs of picking up, a coal ind ...
Wednesday, 20 October 21
CHINA'S RAW COAL OUTPUT DROPS IN SEPTEMBER - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output dropped 0.9 percent year on year to 330 million tonnes last month, data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) ...
Wednesday, 20 October 21
OVER-RELIANCE ON COAL IN OUR POWER MIX HURTING INDIA - LIVEMINT
In spite of the renewables push, coal still accounts for about 50% of India’s installed power capacity. That means a simultaneous demand and ...
|
|
|
Showing 441 to 445 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The University of Queensland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
