We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 25 October 21
A QUESTION OF POSSESSION - THE BALTIC EXCHANGE
Possession and tangibility are closely related concepts long established under English law. Yet a change to these concepts is around the corner. Th ...
Monday, 25 October 21
CHINA VOWS TO SEVERELY PUNISH MARKET VIOLATIONS AMID LOW COAL FUTURES PRICES - GLOBAL TIMES
Domestic coal futures had plunged for three consecutive trading days after the government vowed to crack down on soaring prices, and China’s ...
Monday, 25 October 21
FARMERS MAY JOIN THE COAL COMMODITY MARKET TO REDUCE RISKS - GLOBAL TIMES
A recent trip to by the Global Times to East China’s Shandong Province to get a glimpse of China’s coal supply chain revealed a surpris ...
Monday, 25 October 21
CHINA COAL PRICES MARK WORST WEEK SINCE MAY ON GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION - REUTERS
China’s thermal coal futures plunged on Friday and turned in their worst week in five months, following Beijing’s strongest interventio ...
Friday, 22 October 21
THE BIG PICTURE: ENERGY MARKETS - BREAK WAVE ADVISORS
The shipping markets have been pulled further into wild markets of coal and other energy sources. Given how nebulous this sector is, it’s alw ...
|
|
|
Showing 436 to 440 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The University of Queensland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|