We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 October 21
CHINA'S COAL-RICH SHANXI BEEFS UP COAL PRODUCTION - XINHUA
Major coal producers in north China’s Shanxi Province, a leading coal-producing region of the country, have beefed up production to ensure en ...
Tuesday, 26 October 21
ENERGY CRISIS SHOWS COAL IS AN EXPENSIVE AND UNRELIABLE SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION - IEEFA
Any knee-jerk reaction that urges more investment in coal completely misses the point
India is teetering on the brink of joining a growing glo ...
Tuesday, 26 October 21
CHINA TO INVESTIGATE ENERGY INDEX PROVIDERS IN BID TO TAME COAL PRICES - REUTERS
China said on Monday it will investigate energy price index providers as it urged coal industry participants to “strictly” meet contrac ...
Tuesday, 26 October 21
THERE IS PLENTY OF COAL AND GAS IN THE WORLD BUT A VOLATILE MARKET IS NOBODY'S FRIEND - IEEFA
Gas will be winding its way out of the energy system
Gas prices are continuing to surge around the world. The cost of gas is at unpr ...
Tuesday, 26 October 21
AUSTRALIA EXPORTED 51.6 MLN TONNES OF COAL TO INDIA IN FIRST 10 MONTHS, 19% OF ALL AUSTRALIAN COAL EXPORTS; CHINA WAS THE DESTINATION FOR JUST 0.7% - BANCHERO COSTA
2020 proved to be a truly terrible year for global seaborne coal trade. In 2021 things started pretty badly, but we are seeing increasing signs of ...
|
|
|
Showing 431 to 435 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
