We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 16 October 21
DESPITE HIGHER COAL PRICES, U.S. COAL RECOVERY LOOKS WEAK BY MOST MEASURES - IEEFA
U.S. coal sector is locked into a long-term sectoral decline
Coal prices have surged to the highest level in years in the U.S., and have soare ...
Saturday, 16 October 21
COAL IS 'KING' AS GAS PRICES SOAR, TOTAL CEO SAYS - AND IT’S BACKFIRING ON CLEANER ENERGY GOALS - CNBC
Surging natural gas prices have led to a jump in coal use, with plants in Europe and Asia firing back up as temperatures decline and the world grap ...
Saturday, 16 October 21
VIETNAM'S COAL-FIRED POWER MAY DOUBLE BY 2030 UNDER DRAFT ENERGY PLAN - REUTERS
Vietnam may double the amount of coal-fired electric generation it installs by 2030 under a draft power development plan submitted to the prime min ...
Friday, 15 October 21
AUSTRALIA'S WHITEHAVEN EXPECTS TO BE DEBT-FREE NEXT YEAR AS COAL PRICES SOAR - REUTERS
Australia’s Whitehaven Coal WHC.AX said on Thursday it expects to be debt-free by early 2022, as thermal coal prices surge to record highs on ...
Friday, 15 October 21
WINTER CHILL KEEPS CHINA'S COAL PRICES HIGH, POWER CRUNCH STOKES INFLATION - REUTERS
China coal prices held near record highs on Thursday as cold weather swept into the country’s north and power plants stocked up on the fuel t ...
|
|
|
Showing 451 to 455 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The University of Queensland
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
