We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 01 November 21
COAL PRICES HAVE FURTHER ROOM TO DROP: TOP ECONOMIC PLANNER - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s top economic planner said coal prices have further room to drop on Friday, as the most traded coal futures dropped to below 1,000 yua ...
Saturday, 30 October 21
CHINA'S COAL PRICES SEE BIGGEST WEEKLY FALL IN MORE THAN 5 YEARS - REUTERS
China’s coal futures prices saw their biggest fall in more than five years after the powerful state planner said there is still room to adjus ...
Saturday, 30 October 21
G-20 LEADERS PREPARE STATEMENT TO STOP FUNDING FOREIGN COAL PLANTS - BLOOMBERG
Leaders of the Group of 20 wealthy economies are preparing to pledge to stop funding foreign coal-fired plants, but are still wrangling over climat ...
Friday, 29 October 21
APAC THERMAL COAL SUPPLY TO REMAIN TIGHT AS WINTER LOOMS - FITCH RATINGS
APAC thermal coal prices have surged, hitting historically high levels. The benchmark Newcastle 6,000kcal/kg grade coal reached USD228/tonne in mid ...
Thursday, 28 October 21
CANADA BAN ON SHIPPING COAL WOULD EQUAL SCRAPPING AS MANY AS 3 MILLION CARS - IEEFA
Canada ban on shipping coal would equal scrapping as many as 3 million cars
Change in Canadian policy could have major implications ...
|
|
|
Showing 426 to 430 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Planning Commission, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|