We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 07 February 13
CHINA NDRC APPROVED 10 BILLION YUAN POWER GENERATION PROJECTS
NDRC of China currently announced that some of power grid and power station in Jiangxu, Sichuan and Anhui Province would be newly constructed or ext ...
Thursday, 07 February 13
CAPESIZE : MORE ACTIVE WEEK IN THE PACIFIC - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Atlantic market remained stable with no significant movement in rates. Rates from USG to FEast were around USD 18k and Black Sea to Feast ...
Thursday, 07 February 13
WEAK STEEL MARKET MEANS IRON ORE RALLY LIKELY TO END SOON - FITCH
The sharp rebound in iron ore prices over the last couple of months will hurt margins at non-integrated steel producers in the first quarter of 2013 ...
Tuesday, 05 February 13
THE SHIPPING SECTOR IS " NAVIGATING IN STORMY WATERS" - PWC
The vulnerabilities of the global economy have been exposed and have more than played their part in making 2011 one of the worst years of shipping i ...
Tuesday, 05 February 13
NEWCASTLE PORT COAL SHIPMENTS DROPPED BY 10.77 PERCENT W-O-W
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,412,497 MT of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 4 February 2013, Newca ...
|
|
|
Showing 4391 to 4395 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Australian Coal Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The University of Queensland
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|