We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 05 February 13
CHALLENGER DEEP RESOURCES CORP HAS ENTERED INTO AN EXCLUSIVE MINING AND MARKETING AGREEMENT WITH KEM
COALspot.com - Challenger Deep Resources Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiary, PT Bestindo Energy, has entered into an Exclusivity Agreement r ...
Saturday, 02 February 13
ADARO TO INTRODUCE A NEW BRAND OF ENVIROCOAL, E4700, IN 2013
COALspot.com - Adaro Energy, an Indonesian and leading coal producer in country has achieved a record coal production during 4Q12 of 13.31 mil ...
Saturday, 02 February 13
FREIGHT MARKET MAY REBOUND AFTER CHINESE NEW YEAR - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The freight market was soft and all the indices were down by around 5-7 pct this week.
The BDI was down 6.01 pct closing at 750 po ...
Friday, 01 February 13
ORPHEUS SELLS B26 COAL PROJECTS FOR US$ 2 MILLION TO FOCUS ON SOUTH KALIMANTAN
COALspot.com - Orpheus Energy Limited (ASX: OEG) has announced that it has sold its 51 percent equity stake in the East Kalimantan coal projects, Bl ...
Friday, 01 February 13
HANDY - FLAT; PANAMAX - FLAT TO WEAK; CAPESIZE - WEAK
Handy
The Atlantic market remained stable with no significant movement in rates. Rates from USG to FEast were around USD 17k and Black sea to Feast ...
|
|
|
Showing 4396 to 4400 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
|
| |
| |
|