We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 11 February 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 23.01 PERCENT MORE COAL W-O-W
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,967,761 MT of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 11 February 2013, Newc ...
Sunday, 10 February 13
INDONESIA SUB-BIT SWAPS: "UP" - CFR SOUTH CHINA SWAPS: "DOWN"
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average Q2’ 2013 delivery has gained 0.72 percent W-O-W and CFR South China coal shipme ...
Sunday, 10 February 13
DRY BULK OVERSUPPLY OF TONNAGE SEEN WANING IN THE COMING MONTHS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
It seems that the tide could be shifting in the dry bulk market, in terms of tonnage oversupply, according to the latest data figures. This could ex ...
Sunday, 10 February 13
HIGHER BUNKER PRICE PUSHES SEA FREIGHTS FIRM - REDDY
COALspot.com - The freight market was soft and all at same levels with Chinese year holidays next week.
The BDI was slightly down by 0.27 pct ad ...
Friday, 08 February 13
NORTH P&I CLUB WARNS OF LIQUEFACTION RISK FOR BAUXITE CARGOES
The ‘A’ rated 170 million GT North P&I club has warned shipowners carrying bauxite aluminium ore cargoes that they have the potentia ...
|
|
|
Showing 4386 to 4390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The University of Queensland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Coal Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
