We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 15 February 13
SCRAPPING TO RISE AS BULKER OWNERS SUFFER - DREWRY MARITIME RESEARCH
Drewry's latest Dry Bulk Forecaster report suggests that cash-strapped shipowners will scrap younger and younger ships this year as the dry bulk ma ...
Thursday, 14 February 13
HANDY: ATLANTIC "STABLE"; PACIFIC "QUIET" - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The Atlantic remain stable with rates for FH from USG around USD 18k. The Pacific remains quiet due to Chinese New Year holidays. Rates were ...
Thursday, 14 February 13
BIMCO FORECASTS MOSTLY HIGHER DRY BULK RATES FOR THE COMING WEEKS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Higher steel demand is expected to keep dry bulk rates elevated during the next six weeks, according to the latest BIMCO forecast. The Organization ...
Wednesday, 13 February 13
6TH ANNUAL CBM CONFERENCE
The 6th Annual CBM conference which will be held in Singapore on 18-21 June 201 offers comprehensive insights into leading CBM projects in the Asia- ...
Tuesday, 12 February 13
GOVERNMENT DECLARED INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL PRICE INCHES UP IN FEBRUARY
COALspot.com - The Indonesian government has declared bench mark price for coal has moved upwards in February 2013.
The monthly coal refere ...
|
|
|
Showing 4381 to 4385 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Parliament of New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
|
| |
| |
|
