We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 01 May 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 23.14 PER CENT MORE COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,997,729 tons of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 29 April 2013, Newca ...
Tuesday, 30 April 13
KATINGAN RIA THERMAL COAL TO START PRODUCTION FROM EARLY 2014
COALspot.com - Realm Resources Ltd. (ASX: RRP) has announced the completion of the Feasibility Study for its 51% owned Katingan Ria thermal co ...
Monday, 29 April 13
FIRST TRADES OF SGX API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP
COALspot.com - The SGX API 8 CFR South China Coal Swap went live for clearing on SGX-DC today with a total volume of 25,000 metric tonnes (25 lots). ...
Sunday, 28 April 13
SUB BIT INDONESIA COAL & CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS STAY POSITIVE
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average May 2013 delivery has gained 0.34 percent and CFR South China coal shipment gai ...
Sunday, 28 April 13
PANAMAX FREIGHT COULD BE SOFT NEXT WEEK - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com - This BDI closed slightly lower at 871 points (down by 1.91 pct) mainly due to drop in the Panamax index by almost 10 pct.
Th ...
|
|
|
Showing 4296 to 4300 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
