We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 23 April 13
REALM CONTINUES AS 51% OWNER AND MANAGER OF THE KATINGAN RIA THERMAL COAL PROJECT
COALspot.com - Realm Resources Ltd. (ASX: RRP) has announced today that, the commercial way forward for the development of its 51% held Indonesian t ...
Tuesday, 23 April 13
TIGERS REALM COAL HAS SOME OF THE WORLD'S BEST UNDEVELOPED COKING COAL ASSETS - EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
COALspot.com - “ During 2012, your Company has made very significant progress towards meeting its stated objective of becoming a global player ...
Tuesday, 23 April 13
AUSTRALIA'S NEWCASTLE PORT COAL SHIPMENTS DROPPED BY 4.38 PERCENT W-O-W
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,434,336 tons of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 22 April 2013, Newca ...
Sunday, 21 April 13
INDONESIA - INDIA COAL FREIGHT RATES ARE FIRMING UP - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com – The BDI was up by 1.40 pct closed at 888 points week ended 19 April 2013. The Cape index was down by 2.45 pct closing at 1234 p ...
Friday, 19 April 13
FIRST QUARTER OF 2013 PROVEN A POSITIVE SURPRISE FOR DRY BULK MARKET - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Despite ominous predictions regarding the negative performance of the dry bulk market during the – traditionally weak anyway – first qua ...
|
|
|
Showing 4306 to 4310 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
