We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 06 May 13
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE FALLS CONTINUE
COALspot.com - The Indonesian government’s declared coal bench mark price has lost $ 3.23 / MT in May 2013.
The monthly coal pr ...
Sunday, 05 May 13
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL - MIXED TREND; API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL - POSITIVE TREND
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average June 2013 delivery has gained 0.28 percent and API 8 CFR South China Coal shipment&nb ...
Saturday, 04 May 13
INDONESIA TO INDIA PANAMAX FREIGHT : FLAT TO SOFT - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com - The demand for iron ore picked up and its pushed up the cape size index by 7.86 pct. Cape index closed at 1,344 points. The BDI ...
Friday, 03 May 13
US PRODUCED 17.9 MILLION SHORT TONS (MMST) OF COAL IN A WEEK
COALspot.com - U.S. produced totaled approximately 17.9 million short tons (mmst) in a week (For the week ended April 27, 2013), EIA said in its lat ...
Friday, 03 May 13
SHIP OWNERS ARE INVESTING HEAVILY IN DRY BULK CARRIER NEWBUILDINGS ONCE MORE: IS THERE ANY RATIONALE? - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Despite the fact that the dry bulk market remains heavily oversupplied and just as the orderbook of newbuildings had began to shrink, it seems that sh ...
|
|
|
Showing 4291 to 4295 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
