We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 May 13
THE WORLD LARGEST POWER PLANT COAL EXPORTER SHIPPED 36 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN MARCH
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world largest multi grade coal exporter has shipped 36.165* million tons of coal in March 2013.
Ac ...
Thursday, 09 May 13
DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS KEEP BUILDING NEW VESSELS ON THE BACK OF LOWER PRICES AND IMPROVED MARKET PROSPECTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Despite the doom and gloom that the dry bulk market has experienced during the past couple of years and especially during 2012, ship owners have inc ...
Thursday, 09 May 13
HANDY : RBCT ROUNDS FIXED AT USD 8000 DOP ECI - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
The atlantic market started to pick up with new orders. The USG-Feast was at USD 20k and Black sea-feast was at USD 12k. The pacific mkt rema ...
Wednesday, 08 May 13
PANAMAX VESSELS PROVE TO BE "STARS OF THE MONTH" FOR THE DRY BULK MARKET DURING APRIL - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
They have taken a beating on various occasions during the past few years of the dry bulk market's crisis, but the fact remains, that despite the he ...
Tuesday, 07 May 13
NEWCASTLE PORT'S COAL EXPORTS HOLD STEADY WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,975,160 tons of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 6 May 2013, Newcastl ...
|
|
|
Showing 4286 to 4290 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
