We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 11 November 21
ASIA COAL POWER PIPELINE TO SHRINK BY TWO THIRDS AFTER CHINA FINANCE CUT - REUTERS
Asia’s pipeline of proposed coal-fired power plants is expected to shrink from 65 gigawatts to 22 gigawatts following China’s pledge to ...
Tuesday, 09 November 21
ASIA-PACIFIC IS HOME TO SOME OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST CARBON-EMITTERS - 2 CHARTS SHOW ITS RELIANCE ON COAL - CNBC
Asia-Pacific is home to some of the world’s largest carbon emitters — and experts say much of global efforts to fight climate change de ...
Tuesday, 09 November 21
CHINA DAILY COAL OUTPUT HITS MULTI-YEAR PEAK, PRICES EXPECTED TO FALL - REUTERS
China’s daily coal output hit 11.93 million tonnes last week, a multi-year high as more capacity returned to operation, the state planner sai ...
Thursday, 04 November 21
CHINA'S COAL MARKET SEES SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS: NDRC - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s top economic planner has declared initial success in its efforts to ensure coal supply and stabilize prices, saying that daily coal o ...
Thursday, 04 November 21
CHINA THERMAL COAL PRICES RISE AFTER FALLING FOR 10 DAYS - REUTERS
China thermal coal futures rebounded on Wednesday after falling for 10 days on an expected jump in fuel demand to meet heating needs amid forecasts ...
|
|
|
Showing 416 to 420 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
|
| |
| |
|