We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 19 May 13
COAL PRICES ARE SLUMPING DUE TO WEAK DEMAND
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average July 2013 delivery have gained 0.03 percent and API 8 CFR South China Coal shipment g ...
Sunday, 19 May 13
FREIGHT RATES TO REMAIN UNSTABLE AND VOLATILE - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com – The freight remained weak this week with all the segments down.
The BDI, the Baltic Dry Index is a number issued daily by th ...
Friday, 17 May 13
US COAL PRODUCTION CLIMBED 3.35 PER CENT WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com - U.S. produced totaled approximately 18.50 million short tons (mmst) in a week (For the week ended May 11, 2013), EIA said in its late ...
Thursday, 16 May 13
PANAMAX: THE FORWARD CURVE IS FALLING GRADUALLY - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
The Atlantic market remained quiet. The USG-Feast was at USD 19k and Black Sea-Feast was at USD 11k. The Pacific market remained uncertain as ...
Tuesday, 14 May 13
KALIMANTAN COAL
Press Release : After a very successful conference in 2012, the second annual event will address latest market developments and address the future p ...
|
|
|
Showing 4276 to 4280 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The University of Queensland
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
|
| |
| |
|