We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 11 June 13
COAL: NO SIGN OF RECOVERY - GABRIELLA
COALspot.com: We attended the 19th Annual Coaltrans Asia Conference, where we found most of the speakers were not very optimistic on the outlook for ...
Tuesday, 11 June 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED MORE COAL WEEK ENDED 11 JUNE 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 3,104,509 tons of coal for the week ended 0700 hours 11 June 2013, Newcastle Port Corp. ...
Tuesday, 11 June 13
OUTLOOK FOR CAPESIZES LOOKS GRIM, DESPITE FALLING IRON ORE PRICES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Things aren't looking all that rosy for the dry bulk market, despite a stronger volume of iron ore imports during the months of March and April, as ...
Sunday, 09 June 13
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP IS UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average July 2013 delivery have lost 0.03 percent week on week but gained 0.07 pe ...
Sunday, 09 June 13
IRON ORE DEMAND: WEAK; COAL MOVEMENT: STEADY TO INDIA AND CHINA - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com - The freight market was fairly steady with BDI up by 0.37 per cent closed at 812 points this week.
The Cape index was also ended in ...
|
|
|
Showing 4251 to 4255 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|