We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 12 July 13
U.S. PRODUCED 18.40 MMST COAL WEEK ENDED 6 JULY 2013
COALspot.com – United states the world’s second largest coal producer produced totaled approximately 18.40 million short tons (mmst) of ...
Thursday, 11 July 13
PANAMAX: PACIFIC ROUND PAY AROUND $6,500/D; ATLANTIC ROUND VOYAGE PAY AROUND US$ 10,000/D - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Feast market is quiet, July date cargoes remain unfixed as there is a gap between what owners aiming and charterers willing to pay. There ...
Wednesday, 10 July 13
DRY BULK MARKET IS STILL STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com : With the first half of the year now behind us and, as expected, most shipping segments in the dry bulk market are struggling to survi ...
Tuesday, 09 July 13
COAL PRICE REMAINS SLUGGISH - TRIMEGAH
COALspot.com - Newcastle coal price has reached US$ 76.30/ton (-15.9% YTD), bringing YTD’13 average to stand at US$ 87.90/ton, 6.80% lower tha ...
Tuesday, 09 July 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS JUMP 27.53% ON WEEK TO 2.97 MILLION MT
COALspot.com - Newcastle Coal exports up 27.53% to 2.97 million tons W-o-W.
Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,974,715 tons of coal for the ...
|
|
|
Showing 4211 to 4215 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Australian Coal Association
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
|
| |
| |
|