We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 24 October 13
PANAMAX: RATES SLIP ACROSS BOTH HEMISPHERES
Handy
We were back from holidays but still not much enquiries in the market. Overall future direction is uncertain. Currently, ships passing Singap ...
Thursday, 24 October 13
SHIP PRICES ARE INCREASING ON THE BACK OF IMPROVED MARKET SENTIMENT - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has kept on retreating from its recent highs, ending yesterday at 1,786 points, down 61 points on the day, with Capesizes leadin ...
Wednesday, 23 October 13
DRY BULK MARKET HAS SHOWN SIGNS OF STABILITY - INTERMODAL
Chartering (Wet: Stable+ / Dry: Stable-)
The Dry Bulk market has shown signs of stability this past week, with the sole exception of Capes, rates f ...
Wednesday, 23 October 13
MARKET SENTIMENT IN THE DRY BULK SECTOR REMAINS POSITIVE - YANNIS OLZIERSKY
Market sentiment in the dry bulk sector remains positive despite the latest correction in freight rates for the Capesize sector, which are sliding f ...
Tuesday, 22 October 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SERVED 38 OCEAN GOING VESSELS IN A WEEK
COALspot.com: Power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from Australia's Newcastle port up 0.64 per cent week on week to 3.21 million mt for ...
|
|
|
Showing 4046 to 4050 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
