We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 18 November 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOST ON WEEK; MARGINALLY GAINED ON DAY
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 1.25 pmt month on month on Friday 15 Novemb ...
Sunday, 17 November 13
Q4' 14 API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED $ 3.43 PMT (4.34 %) HIGHER THAN Q1' 14 SWAP
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 0.05 percept d-d on Friday 15 November 2013. The CFR South ...
Saturday, 16 November 13
INDONESIA TO INDIA SUPRAMAX FREIGHT RATES FIRM DUE TO STRONG COAL ACTIVITIES
COALspot.com: The Cape and Panamax index was down this week and pulling down the BDI by about 5 pct. BDI was closed at 1507 points on Friday 1 ...
Friday, 15 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET STILL LINGERING ON, DESPITE PREDICTIONS OF NEW IMMINENT RALLY PRIOR TO THE YEAR'S END - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market hasn't yet managed to stage a new comeback after its retreat from the recent multiyear highs. Yesterday, the industry's benchm ...
Friday, 15 November 13
US COAL PRODUCTION UP 2.59% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
|
|
|
Showing 4006 to 4010 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
|
| |
| |
|
