We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 24 December 13
AUSTRALIAN NEWCASTLE PORT'S WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS UP 11.46% W-W
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 23, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.84 ...
Tuesday, 24 December 13
SGX HAS LAUNCHED FREIGHT FUTURES
COALspot.com: Singapore Exchange (SGX) has announced the launch of freight future yesterday.
According to SGX’s press release, SGX has laun ...
Monday, 23 December 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR AVERAGE Q1' 14 CLOSED AT $ 82.80
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 2.97 percept month on month as on Friday 20 December 2013. ...
Sunday, 22 December 13
Q1' 14 DELIVERY COAL SWAPS CLOSING HIGH COMPARED TO Q4' 14 DELIVERY CLOSING
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 1.31 pmt month on month on Friday 20 December 2013 ...
Sunday, 22 December 13
QUIET FREIGHT MARKET DUE TO LONG HOLIDAYS
COALspot.com: The market was soft this week with all indices down. However towards second half of the week the futures on segments was firming up.
...
|
|
|
Showing 3941 to 3945 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|
