We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 January 14
FREIGHT RATES FALL FURTHER ON LACK OF CARGOES - SOLYM CARRIERS
COALspot.com: The freight market has continued to soften further this week with BDI down by 12.31 pct. BDI was closed at 1,246 points week ended 24 ...
Friday, 24 January 14
US COAL PRODUCTION UP 3.9% ON WEEK IN WEEK ENDED SATURDAY - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.1 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 24 January 14
DRY BULK MARKET STRUGGLING TO FIND FIRM FOOTING IN START OF 2014 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has been faltering since the start of 2014, struggling to hold its ground as low seasonal demand has hindered further growth in ...
Thursday, 23 January 14
PANAMAX : THIS WEEK THE ACTIVITY CAME DOWN DRAMATICALLY - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
With the Chinese New Year approaching the activity and rate levels are sliding in both hemispheres. Rates in the Atlantic have knocked off so ...
Thursday, 23 January 14
30 DAYS LEFT TO REGISTER FOR PACIFIC BASIN COAL CONFERENCE
COALspot.com: (Press Release) : IHS Inc. (NYSE: IHS), the leading global source of information and analysis, will host the Pacific Basin Coal Confer ...
|
|
|
Showing 3886 to 3890 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Coal Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
|
| |
| |
|
