We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 22 January 14
HANDY/SMAX: TALK OF RATES INDICATES A STEADY TO FIRMING TREND - INTERMODAL
Last week closed off on the red once more for the Dry Bulk market, which continues to see freight rates trying to get steady feet. Nonetheless, with ...
Wednesday, 22 January 14
EXPORT BAN ON UNPROCESSED MINERALS EFFECTIVE 12 JANUARY 2014 - THREE - YEAR REPRIEVE FOR SOME, BUT UNCERTAINTY REMAINS: PWC
COALspot.com: On 11 January 2014, only hours before a long-debated ban on the export of unprocessed minerals was to come into effect, the Government ...
Wednesday, 22 January 14
DRY SECTOR: SENTIMENT REMAINS STRONG - INTERMODAL
As we have now entered 2014 and the Chinese are soon entering their Year of the Horse (sit tight for the ride!), it is a great opportunity to see ho ...
Wednesday, 22 January 14
SGX SUCCESSFULLY LAUNCHED FREIGHT FUTURES
COALspot.com: Singapore exchanged announced that, SGX Freight Futures were successfully launched on 20 January 2014, and the first trade ...
Tuesday, 21 January 14
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED SLIGHTLY MORE COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 20 January 14, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 2. ...
|
|
|
Showing 3891 to 3895 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
